MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906170804 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2018.8585528

An MHO Approach for Electric Bus Charging Scheme Optimization Based on Energy Consumption Estimation

2018· article· en· W2906170804 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yuan Liu, Hao Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheme (mathematics)Energy consumptionComputer scienceEstimationConsumption (sociology)Electric energyAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsSystems engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the increasing concerns on environmental issues have promoted the development of alternatives for urban mobility and public transportation. Specifically, the electric buses (EBs) have attracted significant attention due to the flexibility, sustainability, and excellent performance in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Because of the capital cost of the EB batteries, how to optimize the charging scheme of EBs in order to extend the battery lifetime is a major challenge faced by the public transit service providers. This challenge is complicated due to the highly dynamic and random energy consumption in the driving process, which is caused by engine torque, friction force, aerodynamic drag force, road condition, real-time speed, acceleration, and other related physical parameters. In order to address this challenge, a moving horizon optimization (MHO) approach is developed in this paper to optimize the charging scheme and extend the battery lifetime. Based on a detailed physical model involving the aforementioned stochastic variables, an energy consumption estimation model is proposed as a significant step in the optimization process. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated via extensive simulations based on the actual Google transit data from Edmonton Transit Service (ETS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207