EL TRATADO DE LIBRE COMERCIO MÉXICO-ESTADOS UNIDOS Y SU CONTEXTO (1883)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La redaccion de Humanitas, abre este numero con este articulo de alta pertinencia en virtud de la coyuntura actual en que Mexico negocia con Estados Unidos y Canada la vigencia o suspension del Tratado de Libre Comercio entre estos paises (NAFTA). La autora pasa revista a las relaciones comerciales de Mexico desde fines del siglo XVIII con particular enfasis en el siglo XIX. Se enfatiza que desde la emergencia de Mexico como pais soberano partir de 1824, su vecino, Estados Unidos, busco la forma de firmar un acuerdo comercial. Se analiza el cambio ocurrido en ambos pases al final de siglo cuando existio consenso sobre aumentar el intercambio comercial y se nombro la comision negociadora encabezada por Matias Romero y Ulises Grant. A pesar de las muchas objeciones este tratado se firmo en 1883. Luego sobrevino la reaccion proteccionista en Estados Unidos con el famoso Arancel Mckinley. La autora critica que una nacion paladin del librecambismo, defendiera luego el proteccionismo. A contrapelo, el intercambio comercial crecio entre ambas naciones durante el periodo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".