EL TRATADO DE LIBRE COMERCIO MÉXICO-ESTADOS UNIDOS Y SU CONTEXTO (1883)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La redaccion de Humanitas, abre este numero con este articulo de alta pertinencia en virtud de la coyuntura actual en que Mexico negocia con Estados Unidos y Canada la vigencia o suspension del Tratado de Libre Comercio entre estos paises (NAFTA). La autora pasa revista a las relaciones comerciales de Mexico desde fines del siglo XVIII con particular enfasis en el siglo XIX. Se enfatiza que desde la emergencia de Mexico como pais soberano partir de 1824, su vecino, Estados Unidos, busco la forma de firmar un acuerdo comercial. Se analiza el cambio ocurrido en ambos pases al final de siglo cuando existio consenso sobre aumentar el intercambio comercial y se nombro la comision negociadora encabezada por Matias Romero y Ulises Grant. A pesar de las muchas objeciones este tratado se firmo en 1883. Luego sobrevino la reaccion proteccionista en Estados Unidos con el famoso Arancel Mckinley. La autora critica que una nacion paladin del librecambismo, defendiera luego el proteccionismo. A contrapelo, el intercambio comercial crecio entre ambas naciones durante el periodo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".