MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metabolic rewiring beyond Warburg in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: How much do we actually know?

2018· review· en· W2906204636 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriela Galicia-Vázquez, Raquel Aloyz

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersLeukemia and Lymphoma Society
KeywordsChronic lymphocytic leukemiaLeukemiaCancer researchBiologyMetabolismImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia in the western world. CLL consists of the accumulation of malignant B-cells in the blood stream and homing tissues. Although treatable, this disease is not curable, and resistance or relapse is often present. In many cancers, the study of metabolic reprograming has uncovered novel targets that are already being exploited in the clinic. However, CLL metabolism is still poorly understood. The ability of CLL lymphocytes to adapt to diverse microenvironments is accompanied by modifications in cell metabolism, revealing the challenge of targeting the CLL lymphocytes present in all different compartments. Despite this, the study of CLL metabolism led to an ongoing clinical trial using glucose uptake and mitochondrial respiration inhibitors. In contrast, glutamine and fatty acid metabolism remain to be further exploited in CLL. Here, we summarize the present knowledge of CLL metabolism, as well as the metabolic influence of Myc, ATM and p53 on CLL lymphocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Reviews in Oncology/HematologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207