MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906432372 · doi:10.2110/palo.2018.045

EARLY FRESHWATER DIATOMS FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS BATTLE FORMATION IN WESTERN CANADA

2018· article· en· W2906432372 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peter A. Siver, María I. Vélez, Monica Cliveți, Pier L. Binda

Bibliographic record

VenuePalaios · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCretaceousGeologyBattlePaleontologyOceanographyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite the rise of marine diatoms in the world's oceans throughout the Cretaceous, only a handful of fossil localities worldwide detail invasion of freshwater habitats by diatoms commencing in the Late Cretaceous. We report on the occurrence of numerous freshwater diatom specimens and species from the Battle Formation, an extensive freshwater locality in western Canada that formed in the Late Cretaceous approximately 66.5 million years ago (Ma). The formation represents one of the oldest known localities worldwide harboring definitive remains of freshwater diatoms, contains the oldest known freshwater specimens of the centric diatom genus Aulacoseira, and confirms that these early Aulacoseira colonizers formed filaments linked together with interdigitating spines. We further document a high diversity of araphid pennate diatoms belonging to the order Fragilariales. Seven pennate morphotypes were uncovered, six of which definitively lacked a raphe and whose closest modern relatives are in the genera Fragilariforma, Fragilaria, and Stauroforma. Given the extensive coverage of the Battle Formation, it is possible that it represents a network of numerous smaller shallow waterbodies that collectively offered a diversity of environments for colonization, making it a unique deposit for examination of early freshwater diatoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalaiosSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207