Residual Stress Analysis of A362 Aluminum Alloy Gear Case Using Neutron Diffraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mercury Marine has used a new alloy, Mercalloy A362, for the manufacturing of a re-designed lower unit transmission gearcase. The enhanced strength of the alloy allowed for a substantial weight reduction in the new design. The purpose of this study was to examine and determine why cracking may develop in the gear casing during in service testing. Two types of material states, (i) as cast and (ii) heat treated were compared. Metallography and neutron diffraction analysis was carried out at locations identified as being areas of high stress by Magma software – which was performed in a separate study. Microstructural characterization at these locations revealed microstructural and the compositional differences. Differences in the porosity, eutectic phase, and volume fraction of the precipitates were observed at various locations of interest in each material state. The residual stress analysis was performed with application of neutron diffraction and revealed that the stresses in the as-cast component reached a maximum value of 120 MPa, which is below the yield strength of the alloy. The heat treatment applied to the castings reduced the stress by approximately 50 MPa. Based on the microstructure and neutron diffraction results, it is likely that performing a heat treatment process extends the lifetime of the component, however, it may not completely eliminate the cracking problem. Farther studies are currently nearing completion, targeting the mass production of the redesigned gearcase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".