MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906466486

Nutrition Science in India: Green leafy vegetables: A potent food source to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies

2017· article· en· W2906466486 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Sreenivasa Rao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDiverse Scientific Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental healthMicronutrientMalnutritionMicronutrient deficiencyObesityMedicineDeveloping countryPublic healthDietary Reference IntakePopulationSocioeconomic statusGerontologyEconomic growthNutrientBiologyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Micronutrient Deficiencies (MNDs) are of great public health and socioeconomic importance worldwide. They affect low-income countries but are also a significant factor in health problems in industrialized societies with impacts among wide vulnerable groups in the population, including women, children, the middle-aged,and ederley. Nutrition deals with the intake of food, considered in relation to the nutritional andenergy needs of the individual. By consuming a healthy diet, many of the health problems can be avoided. The diet is largely determined by the perceived palatability of foods. Globally, majority of people are consuming consistently less than the daily recommended allowance requirement of the nutrient components. Even in developed countries like Australia, Canada, Europe, UK and USA researchers have concluded that there is large gap between actual and recommended consumption of both green leafy vegetables and fruits despite decades of concern and publicity. This gap is much more in developing countries including India. The principal nutritional problems in developing countries include protein-energy malnutrition (PEM), iodine deficiency, vitamin A deficiency (VAD) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). A growing number of countries are confronted with new health risks linked to diet, namely cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diabetes, obesity and cancer. Nutrition science is being dominated by two conflicting observations since 1960. One is how to eat healthy and maintain a healthy body weight and the other hand rapidly increasing rates of obesity and diabetes suggest misconception about the conventional thinking. In 1960 fewer than 13 percent of Americans were obese and 1 percent was diabetes. The obese percentage was almost triple and diabetes has increased seven fold today. Mean while the research literature also has been ballooned on diabetes and obesity from 1960 to 2016. Though the green leafy vegetables are playing an important role to prevent the nutritional disorders, the extensive literature explored that there is a gap of knowledge in the appropriate consumption of GLV and its benefits to human. Further efforts should make to widen the knowledge in this unmapped area of research. This trend was observed in other nutritional disorders as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiverse Scientific Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207