Bearing Capacity Model of Corroded RC Eccentric Compression Columns Based on Hermite Interpolation and Fourier Fitting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With an extension in service years, bridges inevitably suffer from performance deterioration. Columns are the main components of bridge structures, which support the superstructure. The damage of pier columns is often more harmful to bridges than that of other components. To accurately evaluate the time-varying characteristics of corroded columns, this paper proposes a new model for the bearing capacity evaluation of deteriorated reinforced concrete (RC) eccentric compression columns based on the Hermite interpolation and Fourier function. Firstly, the axial compression point, the pure bending point and the balanced failure point were selected as the basic points, and the deteriorated strength of these basic points was calculated by considering factors such as concrete cracking, reduction of reinforcement area, buckling of the steel bar, bond slip and strength reduction of confined concrete. After that, the interpolation points were generated by a piecewise cubic Hermite interpolating polynomial, and the explicit expression of the interpolation points fitting function was realized by the trigonometric Fourier series model. Finally, comparison studies based on measured data from forty-five corroded RC eccentric compression columns were conducted to investigate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method. The results show that: (1) the prediction results for bearing capacity of corroded RC columns are in good agreement with the measured data, with the average ratio of predicted results to test results at 1.06 and the standard deviation at 0.14; (2) the proposed model unifies the three stress states of axial compression, eccentric compression and pure bending, and is consistent with the continuum mechanics characteristics; (3) the decrements of axial load carrying capacity for 10% and 50% of the corrosion rate are 31.4% and 45.2%, while in flexure they are 25.4% and 77.4%, respectively; and (4) the test data of small-scale specimens may overestimate the negative effect of corrosion on the bearing capacity of actual structures. The findings in this paper could lay a solid starting point for structural life prediction technologies based on nondestructive testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".