MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906621567 · doi:10.1089/crispr.2018.0045

Double-Stranded Biotinylated Donor Enhances Homology-Directed Repair in Combination with Cas9 Monoavidin in Mammalian Cells

2018· article· en· W2906621567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe CRISPR Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiotinylationHomology (biology)CRISPRBiologyHomology directed repairCell biologyChemistryComputational biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsDNADNA repairGeneNucleotide excision repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homology-directed repair (HDR) induced by site specific DNA double-strand breaks with CRISPR-Cas9 is a precision gene editing approach that occurs at low frequency in comparison to indel forming non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In order to obtain high HDR percentages in mammalian cells, we engineered a Cas9 protein fused to a monoavidin domain to bind biotinylated donor DNA. In addition, we used the cationic polymer, polyethylenimine, to deliver Cas9-donor DNA complexes into cells. Improved HDR percentages of up to 90% in three loci tested (CXCR4, EMX1, and TLR) in standard HEK293T cells were observed. Our results suggest that donor DNA biotinylation and Cas9-donor conjugation in addition to delivery influence HDR efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it