MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906624494 · doi:10.1002/jmri.26574

Rapid single‐breath hyperpolarized noble gas MRI‐based biomarkers of airspace enlargement

2018· article· en· W2906624494 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Westcott, Fumin Guo, Grace Párraga, Alexei Ouriadov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoRobarts Clinical TrialsSunnybrook Health Science CentreWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlpha-1 Foundation
KeywordsMedicineNuclear medicineUndersamplingCOPDEffective diffusion coefficientVoxelProspective cohort studyRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Multi‐b diffusion‐weighted hyperpolarized‐gas MRI measures pulmonary airspace‐enlargement using apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and mean‐linear‐intercepts (Lm). Purpose To develop single‐breath 3D multi‐b diffusion‐weighted 3He and 129Xe MRI using k‐space undersampling. Rapid, cost‐efficient, single‐breath acquisitions may facilitate clinical translation. Study Type Prospective. Subjects We evaluated 12 participants, including nine subjects (mean age = 69 ± 9) who were included in the retrospective experiment and three chronic pulmonary obstruction disease (COPD) patients (mean age = 81 ± 6) who participated in the prospective study. Field Strength A whole‐body 3 T 2D/3D fast gradient recall echo (FGRE) sequence. Assessment Hyperpolarized 3He/129Xe MRI, spirometry, plethysmography computed tomography (CT). We evaluated 129Xe ADC/morphometry estimates by retrospectively undersampling previously acquired fully sampled multibreath, multi‐b diffusion‐weighted data. Next, we prospectively evaluated the feasibility of accelerated (AF = 7) 3He MRI static‐ventilation/T2* (extra short‐TE, b = 0 image) and ADC/morphometry (five b‐values) maps using a single gas‐dose and 16‐second breath‐hold. To conservatively evaluate cost‐improvement, we compared total costs of single vs. multiple 129Xe doses. Statistical Tests Multivariate analysis of variance, independent t‐tests and voxel‐by‐voxel basis difference test. Results For the retrospectively undersampled 129Xe data, a nonsignificant mean difference for ADC/Lm of 14%/12%, 12%/8%, and 11%/9% was observed (all, P > 0.4) between the fully sampled and accelerated data for the never‐smoker, COPD, and alpha‐1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) groups, respectively. The control never‐smoker group had significantly lower ADC (P < 0.001) and Lm (P < 0.001) than the COPD/AATD group for both fully sampled and accelerated data. For the prospectively acquired 3He MRI data, static‐ventilation, T2*, ADC, and morphometry maps were acquired using a single 16‐second breath‐hold scan and single gas dose. Accelerated imaging resulted in cost savings of ~$US 1000/patient, a conservative estimate based on 129Xe MRI dose savings (single vs. five doses). Data Conclusion This is a proof‐of‐concept demonstration of accelerated (7×) morphometry that shows that less cost‐ and time‐efficient multibreath methods that lead to variability and patient fatigue may be avoided in the future. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207