MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906734066 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000013799

Acute renal failure in a patient with PR3-ANCA and monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease

2018· article· en· W2906734066 on OpenAlexaff
Clarissa A. Cassol, Pawan Kumar Dhruva Rao, Juarez R. Braga

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMonoclonalDiseaseMonoclonal antibodyAntibodyImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Acute renal failure developing over a short period of time with evidence of glomerular disease by urine sediment microscopy characterizes the clinical syndrome of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN), of which the most common causes are ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis (GN), immune-complex mediated GN and anti-GBM disease. PATIENT CONCERNS: This was a middle-aged gentleman who presented with acute renal failure and a positive PR3-ANCA. DIAGNOSIS: Renal biopsy showed an unusual combination of PR3-ANCA GN with focal crescents, monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD) and mesangial IgA deposition on renal biopsy. INTERVENTIONS: Serum and urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) and immunofixation showed no detectable monoclonal paraprotein; bone marrow biopsy was negative for plasma cell neoplasia. He received high dose steroids and rituximab. OUTCOMES: The patient did not respond to treatment and progressed to end-stage renal failure within 2 months after presentation. LESSONS: To our knowledge, the simultaneous occurrence of MIDD, PR3-ANCA and mesangial IgA has not been reported. This case highlights not only the diagnostic but also the therapeutic challenges that such a complex case presentation poses to clinicians, where the culprit may not always be what would seem most obvious (such as ANCA in a patient with RPGN) but may, in fact, be an underlying and unsuspected disease, or possibly a combination of both.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207