MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906833180 · doi:10.2134/jeq2018.08.0308

Gypsum Amendment Reduces Redox‐Induced Phosphorous Release from Freshly Manured, Flooded Soils to Floodwater

2018· article· en· W2906833180 on OpenAlexafffundabout
R. S. Dharmakeerthi, Darshani Kumaragamage, Srimathie P. Indraratne, Doug Goltz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Quality · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersUniversity of Winnipeg
KeywordsAmendmentGypsumSoil waterChemistryManureRedoxSurface runoffEnvironmental chemistryPore water pressureEnvironmental scienceAgronomySoil scienceEcologyGeologyGeotechnical engineeringBiologyInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of gypsum in reducing runoff P losses from soils and the mechanisms responsible are well documented; however, gypsum amendment effects in reducing redox‐induced P losses from flooded soils are less researched and documented. We examined the effect of gypsum amendment on P release from freshly manured soils to pore water and floodwater with continuous flooding for 56 d in the laboratory. Three soils (Pembina, Denham, and Dencross series) collected from Manitoba, Canada, were preincubated with liquid swine manure. Each preincubated manured soil was packed into vessels with or without recycled wallboard gypsum in triplicates and flooded for 56 d, during which pore water and floodwater were sampled weekly and analyzed for pH and dissolved reactive P (DRP), Ca, Mg, Fe, and Mn concentrations. Change in soil redox potential (Eh) with flooding was also monitored. Wallboard gypsum amendment significantly decreased the pore water and surface floodwater DRP concentrations in all three soils for most days after flooding (DAF). The Dencross soil, which had Olsen P about fivefold greater than the other soils, showed the greatest magnitude decrease in DRP concentration with gypsum amendment, by 1.27 mg L −1 on 49 DAF and 0.99 mg L −1 on 21 DAF for pore water and floodwater, respectively. Gypsum amendment (i) delayed the Eh reduction with flooding beyond +200 mV, (ii) decreased pore water pH, and (iii) increased concentrations of Ca, Mg, and Mn in pore water favoring precipitation of P, all of which may have directly or indirectly reduced the P release from flooded soils to overlying floodwater. Core Ideas Floodwater P concentration increased with flooding time in all soils and treatments. Redox‐induced P release was less from gypsum‐amended than unamended soils. Gypsum amendment reduced both pore water and floodwater P concentrations. Adding gypsum reduced floodwater P concentration to a maximum of 57%. The effectiveness of gypsum in reducing P release from flooded soils is soil dependent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental QualitySame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207