La mise en place d’un protocole d’accompagnement à la maternité en ergothérapie, auprès de femmes en situation de handicap moteur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La maternite est un projet qui peut surgir chez n’importe quelle femme a un moment donne de son parcours de vie. La maternite des femmes en situation de handicap moteur, n’est pas facilite par le manque d’informations et de services specialises. Peu d’ergotherapeutes peuvent mettre en place ces accompagnements. De plus, dans le cas ou cela est fait, leur pratique n’est pas encadre par un protocole de soins. Les canadiens ont bien avance dans leur demarche aupres de ce public, et ont deja elabore un protocole d’accompagnement de ces meres ou futures meres. Ce travail a pour but de mettre en evidence les elements complexes qui entoure la maternite, le processus de mise en place d’un protocole specialise, ainsi que la demarche qualite. A la suite d’entretiens avec des ergotherapeutes, il est mis en evidence la necessite d’un accompagnement en ergotherapie, en collaboration avec d’autres professionnels de sante. Ainsi que l’interet de la mise en place d’un protocole de soins specialise, dans le but de formaliser et d’ancrer cette pratique, dans une demarche qualite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.288 | 0.427 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".