MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy, safety, and cost efficiency of rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and oxaliplatin (RGDOx) in B-cell NHL: Report of the prospective multicentric trial NCT01019863.

2014· article· en· W2906959486 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marco Lefebvre, Rami Kotb, Jean-François Larouche, Mariette Lepine Martin, Anick Champoux, Annie Morin, Éric Turcotte, Jean Dufresne, Hans Knecht, Patrice Beauregard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusBC Cancer AgencyUniversité de SherbrookeCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeutropeniaRituximabInternal medicineRegimenGemcitabineGastroenterologySurgeryFebrile neutropeniaToxicityChemotherapyLymphoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

8581 Background: Cisplatinum-based 2nd line therapy is poorly tolerated. We evaluated the activity and toxicity of an outpatient RGDOx regimen Methods: Patients (pts) with CD20+ NHL, without limitation of age, general condition or prior treatments, were eligible for up to 8 biweekly cycles of rituximab 375 mg/m², gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² on day 1 and dexamethasone 40mg/day orally on day 1- 3. Toxicity was reported according to NCI criteria. Response was assessed at mid and end of treatment. Pts were followed up to 24 months. Costs were collected on per diem canadian interprovincial rates and hospital pharmacy medication costs as of Oct. 2011. Results: The planned 50 pts were included from 2009 to Jan. 2013. Two died before starting therapy and were not included in this analysis; 17 females, 31 males, median age 70 (47 - 86) yrs with relapsed (37) or refractory (11) B-NHL (DLBCL 25, FL 8, MCL 11, Richter 2 and CLL 2). 83% had stage III/IV disease, aaIPI / FLIPI ≥2 (85%), median Charlson co-morbidity score of 4, average 2 (1-8) previous treatment lines, 47 previously treated with rituximab and 9 with cisplatin. A total of 250 cycles were given. This was well tolerated. Common grade I-II AE: Sensory neuropathy 66%, diarrhea 36% asthenia 35%, and bone pain 18%. Grade III/IV: Lymphopenia 12%, neutropenia 3% and thrombocytopenia 4%. Two died after 1 and 3 cycles, before documenting response. The overall response was 57% (n=46, CR 40%, PR 17%, PD: 43%). DLCBL (40%, 8%, 52%), FL (38%, 25%, 38%), MCL (50%, 20%, 30%). The median survival was 18.4 months (n=48) and disease-free median survival among responders was 15.7 months (n=27). Refractoriness to previous treatment or response lasting less than 12 months was associated with poorer outcome. Previous cisplatin therapy tended to predict lower response. Average 6-cycle course was associated with 4.8 days of hospitalization, 0.7 medical visits for iatrogenic side effects and 7.3 visits for additional laboratory tests. Mean cost for 6 cycles of RGDOX was $Can 54,991 with a median cost per life year of $Can 35,863. Conclusions: RGDOx is safe, effective and cost-effective for relapsing/refractory B-Cell NHL. Clinical trial information: NCT01019863.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207