Long-term Follow-up of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Tube Position Changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term (4.5 to 6 y) changes in the position of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) tubes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients aged 18 years and above, 1 to 2 months post-AGV implantation were enrolled. Tube position was evaluated using anterior segment optical coherence tomography at baseline and final follow-up. The intracameral tube length (ICL), tube-cornea (TC) distance, and cornea-tube angle were measured. Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used to assess whether the changes in parameters from baseline were significant. RESULTS: In total, 11 eyes of 9 patients were included in the analysis. Mean duration of follow-up was 5.2±0.8 years (4.4 to 6.1 y). The ICL increased from 1.58±0.40 to 1.74±0.62 mm (P=0.18). The TC decreased from 0.36±0.12 to 0.29±0.05 mm (P=0.04). The cornea-tube angle decreased from 27.76±5.57 to 24.82±5.69 degrees (P=0.08). Overall, 73% of the tubes moved toward the cornea (mean 0.11 mm, over 4.4 to 6.1 y). In total, 73% showed an increase in ICL; 45% showed an increase of >0.3 mm [mean 0.50 mm (33%) increase]. Two of 11 tubes (18%) showed no significant change in the parameters (ICL, 0.03 and 0.01 mm increase; TC, 0 and 0.01 mm increase); these tubes were noted to lie on the iris. CONCLUSIONS: Tubes tend to move toward the cornea over time. To avoid corneal damage and involvement of the visual axis in the future, tubes should be reasonably short and inserted tangentially, preferably in the posterior one third of the anterior chamber.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".