Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book is premised on the question of how and why the Black Lives Matter movement, arguably the most broad and successful black activism since the civil rights and black power eras, emerged during the tenure of the first black president, and what that can reveal about the prospects of building another sustained freedom movement in the United States. Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor asks these questions to frame the book's larger purpose: to advocate for an independent, anticapitalist, socialist movement spearheaded by African Americans but based on intersectional solidarity among all of those victimized by the growing economic inequality and state repression in the United States. While this is not a work of academic history, Taylor's analysis and arguments are deeply historical, based on a comprehensive synthesis of the scholarship on the long civil rights movement and analysis of the structural origins of persistent racial inequality in the United States. She provides a thorough survey of the dismal economic reality lived by most black Americans, the dismantling of the welfare state and the corresponding rise of the carceral state, and never-ending state-sanctioned violence against minority communities—most visible through police brutality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".