Determination of Subjective Well-Being Level in Adolescents in Association with Sport Participation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the subjective well-being levels of high school students in association with theirparticipation in school sports and to examine whether participating in school sports has an impact on subjectivewell-being. The research place is the high schools in Erzincan city centre. The sample contains 1004 adolescentsincluding 479 female and 525 male students randomly selected according to the school types. The data of this studyare collected by using ''Subjective Well-Being Scale'' (High School Form) and ''Personal Information Form.''Research data are analysed using the SPSS 22.0 statistical programme. Mann Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis Htest are used for the analysis of the data. As a result, it is observed that participation in school sports increasessubjective well-being level of students. Subjective well-being level of female students who participate in schoolsports is higher. School types affect the subjective well-being levels. It is found that the subjective well-being level ofthe students who do not participate in school sports decreases as the grade of the student increases. The students withthe lowest household income have lower subjective well-being levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".