MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907413878 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2007-044-0

The Geometry of <i>L</i><sub>0</sub>

2007· article· en· W2907413878 on OpenAlexfundno aff
N. J. Kalton, Alexander Koldobsky, Vladyslav Yaskin, Maryna Yaskina

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicPoint processes and geometric inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Mathematical SocietyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsUnit sphereLinear subspaceEmbeddingRegular polygonDimension (graph theory)Convex geometryPure mathematicsMultiplicative functionEuclidean geometryNormed vector spaceUnit (ring theory)GeometryCombinatoricsMathematical analysisConvex setConvex optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Suppose that we have the unit Euclidean ball in ℝn and construct new bodies using three operations — linear transformations, closure in the radial metric, and multiplicative summation defined by We prove that in dimension 3 this procedure gives all origin-symmetric convex bodies, while this is no longer true in dimensions 4 and higher. We introduce the concept of embedding of a normed space in L0 that naturally extends the corresponding properties of Lp-spaces with p ≠ 0, and show that the procedure described above gives exactly the unit balls of subspaces of L0 in every dimension. We provide Fourier analytic and geometric characterizations of spaces embedding in L0, and prove several facts confirming the place of L0 in the scale of Lp-spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesFrench-language works237,207