VISUALIZATION AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF INTEGRAL SKIN CELLULAR POLYMERIC COMPOSITES USING X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on 3-dimensional non-destructive characterization of the morphologies of integral-skin cellular polymeric composites using X-ray Microtomography. Rapid Rotational Foam Molding (RRFM) is a polymer processing technology that is capable of creating composites with intricate shapes that have a foamed core surrounded by an integral solid skin layer (similar to the structure of a bone). The analyzed specimens were extracted from composites processed in RRFM having a solid skin made of polypropylene (PP) grades combined with foamed cores made of both polyethylene (PE) and PP grades by implementing a suitable chemical blowing agent (CBA) in extrusion. The resulting cellular structures pertaining to the foamed core and the near-skin area were visualized and their morphological quality was evaluated in terms of cell size distribution and cell density. The stress-strain behavior and 3-dimensional structural changes were monitored and characterized with in-situ compression testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".