MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907688603

O desafio da acessibilidade da informação na web para a Educação Infantil

2018· article· pt· W2907688603 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Caroline de Oliveira Ferraz

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente trabalho aborda a problematica da falta acessibilidade da informacao voltada para a educacao de alunos dos primeiros anos do ensino fundamental e do ensino pre-escolar, alem da pouca utilizacao de ferramentas da Tecnologia da Informacao e Comunicacao, da Internet no ensino de educandos nesta fase escolar. Abordando temas que envolvem a acessibilidade de forma geral e a acessibilidade para a educacao, como acessibilidade fisica de pessoas e nao apenas educandos a edificacoes de estabelecimentos de ensino e a acessibilidade a informacao analogica de educandos com limitacoes intelectuais fazem parte da politica de Educacao Inclusiva adotada por governos e gestores de educacao nos ultimos anos. Concluindo, constam algumas das possiveis estrategias que poderao tornar a informacao disponibilizada na Internet acessiveis ao publico alvo do estudo, alunos do ensino basico. Tambem constam opcoes que incentivem a utilizacao da Internet e de ferramentas da Tecnologia da Informacao e Comunicacao para o ensino basico, bem como o desenvolvimento de instrumentos que possibilitem o acesso a informacao.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.011
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207