MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907816438 · doi:10.1149/2.0121905jes

CuS/Graphene Nanocomposite as a Transparent Conducting Oxide and Pt-Free Counter Electrode for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

2018· article· en· W2907816438 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahyar Mohammadnezhad, Gurpreet Singh Selopal, Nasser Alsayyari, Rusoma Akilimali, Fabiola Navarro‐Pardo, Zhiming M. Wang, B.L. Stansfield, Haiguang Zhao, Federico Rosei

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQingdao UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaGovernment of Jiangxi ProvinceCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsDye-sensitized solar cellGrapheneAuxiliary electrodeDielectric spectroscopyMaterials scienceCyclic voltammetryCopper sulfideOxideNanocompositeEnergy conversion efficiencyChemical engineeringElectrodePlatinumElectrochemistryCopperNanotechnologyInorganic chemistryOptoelectronicsChemistryCatalysisMetallurgyElectrolyteOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a simple, low temperature and solution-processable approach to prepare a composite film of copper sulfide/graphene (CuS-G) as a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) and platinum (Pt)-free CE for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs). We find that CuS with 3.3 vol% of graphene (CuS-3G) yields the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 4.83%, which is about 12% higher than DSSCs based on CEs made of pristine CuS. After optimizing the graphene concentration, the PCE of the DSSC assembled with the optimized CuS-3G is comparable to that based on Pt CE. The similar performance of the CuS-3G CE compared with Pt CE is mainly attributed to the small series resistance and high electrocatalytic activity of the CuS-3G CE; this is confirmed by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. These results indicate a straightforward methodology for the low cost and easy synthesis of an alternative CE in DSSCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207