Cysteine oxidation triggers amyloid fibril formation of the tumor suppressor p16 <sup>INK4A</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Accumulation of the CDK4/6 inhibitor p16 INK4A in response to oncogenic transformation leads to cell cycle arrest and senescence and is therefore frequently lost in cancer. p16 INK4A is also known to accumulate under conditions of oxidative stress and thus could potentially be regulated by the reversible oxidation of cysteines (redox signaling). Indeed, oxidation of the single cysteine in p16 INK4A in human cells occurs under relatively mild oxidizing conditions and leads to disulfide-dependent dimerization. p16 INK4A is an all alpha-helical protein, but here we report that upon cysteine-dependent dimerization, p16 INK4A undergoes a dramatic structural rearrangement and forms aggregates that have the typical features of amyloid fibrils, including binding of diagnostic dyes, presence of cross-β sheet structure, and typical dimensions found in electron microscopy. p16 INK4A amyloid formation abolishes its function as a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Collectively, these observations mechanistically link the cellular redox state to the inactivation of p16 INK4A through the formation of amyloid fibrils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".