Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teknologi pertanian selalu mengalami perkembangan. Salah satu wujud perkembangan terbaru teknologi yang digunakan dalam pertanian adalah vertical farming. Vertical farming telah dilakukan di negara-negara maju seperti Amerika Serikat, Kanada, Jepang, Korea dan China dengan sebutan Plant Factory with Artificial Lighting (PFAL) atau Indoor Vertical Farms. Agar masyarakat Indonesia sadar, tahu dan mengerti akan perkembangan teknologi pertanian tersebut maka diperlukan adanya objek arsitektur yang menyediakan dan mendidik masyarakat mengenai perkembangan teknologi pertanian, dalam hal ini berupa vertical farming. Produksi dan edukasi akan dilakukan dengan dua cara, yaitu dengan PFAL dan Agro-Edu-Tourism. Permasalahan desain yang diangkat adalah bagaimana secara arsitektur mengharmonisasi antara fasilitas PFAL dengan Agro-Edu-Tourism, bangunan tinggi dengan lanskap, vertical farming dengan eksisting pasar bunga, dengan tetap memperhatikan efisiensi penggunaan lahan. Metode desain yang digunakan dalam merancang vertical farming adalah metode tipologi. Jacques Nicolas – Louis Durand berpendapat bahwa teori tipologi melihat arsitektur sebagai seni menyusun elemen-elemen yang telah ditentukan (Jormakka, 2003). Dalam desain ini elemen-elemen yang telah ditentukan adalah kebutuhan sistem dan ruang untuk vertical farming. Kebutuhan sistem dan ruang ditentukan dari tipologi vertical farming dan preseden vertical farming yang telah dibangun. ============================================================================================================== Agricultural technology is always improving. One of the latest technological developments used in agriculture is vertical farming. Vertical farming has been conducted in developed countries such as the United States, Canada, Japan, Korea and China as Plant Factory with Artificial Lighting (PFAL) or Indoor Vertical Farms. In order for the people of Indonesia to aware, know and understand the development of agricultural technology, it is necessary to have an architectural facility that provides and educate the development of agricultural technology, in this case in the form of vertical farming. Production and education will be conducted in two ways, namely PFAL and Agro-Edu-Tourism. Design issues raised are how to architecturally harmonize between PFAL facilities with Agro-Edu-Tourism, high-rise buildings with landscape, vertical farming with existing flower market, while still paying attention to the efficiency of land use. The design method used in designing vertical farming is typology method. Jacques Nicolas - Louis Durand argues that typology theory sees architecture as the art of composing predetermined elements (Jormakka, 2003). In this design the elements that have been determined are the system and space requirements for vertical farming. System and space requirements are determined from the vertical farming typology and vertical farming precedents that have been built.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".