Heteroleptic Ir(III)N<sub>6</sub> Complexes with Long-Lived Triplet Excited States and in Vitro Photobiological Activities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of cationic heteroleptic iridium(III) complexes bearing tris-diimine ligands [Ir(phen) 2 (R-phen)] 3+ (R-phen = phenanthroline ( 1 ), 3,8-diphenylphenanthroline ( 2 ), 3,8-dipyrenylphenanthroline ( 3 ), 3-phenylphenanthroline ( 4 ), 3-pyrenylphenanthroline ( 5 ), and 3,8-diphenylethynylphenanthroline ( 6 )) were synthesized and characterized. These complexes possessed phen ligand-localized 1 π,π* transitions below 300 nm, and charge transfer ( 1 CT) and/or 1 π,π* transitions between 300 and 520 nm. In 1, 2, 4, and 6, the low-energy bands were mixed 1 CT/ 1 π,π*. However, the increased π-donating ability of the pyrenyl substituent(s) in 3 and 5 split the low-energy bands into a pyrene-based 1 π,π* transition at 300–380 nm and an intraligand charge transfer ( 1 ILCT) transition at 380–520 nm. All complexes were emissive at room temperature in CH 3 CN, but the parentage of the emitting state varied depending on the R substituent(s). Complex 1 exhibited predominantly phen ligand-localized 3 π,π* emission mixed with metal-to-ligand charge transfer ( 3 MLCT) character, whereas the emission of 2, 4, and 6 was predominantly from the excited-state with 3 π,π*/ 3 ILCT/ 3 MLCT character. The emission from 3 and 5 was dominated by pyrene-based 3 π,π* states mixed with 3 ILCT character. The different natures of the lowest triplet excited states were also reflected by the different spectral features and lifetimes of the triplet transient absorption of these complexes. Complexes 3 and 5 had singlet oxygen quantum yields as high as 81 and 72%, respectively. Both gave submicromolar phototoxicities toward cancer cells (SK-MEL-28 human melanoma) and bacteria ( S. aureus and S. mutans ) with visible-light activation (and marginal to no photobiological activity with red light). Their visible-light phototherapeutic indices (PIs) toward SK-MEL-28 cells were 248 for 3 and >435 for 5; PIs were lower in bacteria (≤62) because of their inherent antimicrobial activities. Both complexes were shown to produce substantial amounts of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may account for their photobiological activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".