MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908044025 · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001287

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause symptom severity and impact outcome measures: are they reliable and correlated?

2018· article· en· W2908044025 on OpenAlexaff
Joanie Mercier, Mélanie Morin, Barbara Reichetzer, Marie‐Claude Lemieux, Samir Khalifé, Chantale Dumoulin

Bibliographic record

VenueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntraclass correlationConfidence intervalKappaGenitourinary systemMenopauseReliability (semiconductor)Convergent validityInternal medicineCorrelationUrinary incontinencePhysical therapyPsychometricsSurgeryClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The Most Bothersome Symptom Approach (MBSA) assesses symptom severity of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), and identifies the symptom with the greatest burden. The Atrophy Symptoms Questionnaire (ASQ) assesses the impact of GSM symptoms on the activities of daily living. The psychometric properties of these outcomes remain to be completely assessed. This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of the MBSA and the ASQ and their convergent validity. METHOD: One evaluator administered the outcomes twice 2 weeks apart to postmenopausal women with GSM and urinary incontinence. MBSA reliability was assessed with the graphical analysis of paired differences, Kappa coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the ASQ reliability, with paired t test and ICC. The convergent validity of both outcomes was investigated through their association with the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Thirty-one women participated in the study. For the MBSA, the severity of the most bothersome symptom obtained a good reliability with 80% observed agreement between sessions, a substantial kappa (0.67 ± 0.12) and excellent ICC (0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.75-0.94]). For the ASQ, no significant difference was found between sessions (P = 0.146) and ICC indicated excellent reliability (0.85 [95% confidence interval 0.69-0.93]). There was a large, positive correlation between the severity of the most bothersome symptom selected by the participants in the MBSA and the ASQ total score for the two measurement sessions (T1: r = 0.587, P = 0.001 and T2: r = 0.601, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MBSA and the ASQ are reliable outcome measures in postmenopausal women with GSM and urinary incontinence. Our findings support good convergent validity of those two outcomes as they showed a significant positive correlation between the severity of GSM symptoms and their impact on activities of daily living.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause SocietySame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207