Bibliographic record
Abstract
« Il serait temps d'user d'un peu plus de prevoyance dans le trafic des richesses naturelles, d'amender la politique de concessions sans recours si nous ne voulons pas etre reduits bientot au role de serviteurs dans notre propre maison. » (Esdras Minville, 1923) Des ressources cedees au plus offrant pour des redevances derisoires, des regions pillees et negligees pour une politique centralisee a outrance, une derive democratique, telle est l'analyse du Quebec d'Esdras Minville, dans les annees 1920-1940, qui ressemble aujourd'hui a une vision prophetique. Fier Gaspesien, il fut le premier directeur canadien-francais de l'ecole des Hautes Etudes commerciales de Montreal et le premier economiste a proner la liberation economique du Quebec et la decentralisation territoriale. La colonie agroforestiere de Grande-Vallee, qu'il a creee en 1938, est un modele d'organisation cooperative et d'exploitation integree des ressources, centree sur la communaute locale. En revenant sur l'oeuvre et le travail de terrain d'Esdras Minville, Romeo Bouchard navigue entre etude historique et programme politique pour le Quebec de demain ; car ce fervent defenseur d'un Quebec autonome et decentralise demontre a chaque page combien cette pensee, a contre-courant, reste une vivante source d'inspiration. Entre chroniques d'hier et d'aujourd'hui, ce polemiste relance, depuis la Gaspesie, la reflexion sur le territoire et l'avenir du Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".