MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908062222 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2018.8589159

Joint Caching and Resource Allocation in D2D-Assisted Heterogeneous Networks

2018· article· en· W2908062222 on OpenAlexaff
Wael Jaafar, Wessam Ajib, Halima Elbiaze

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHeterogeneous networkMacroComputer networkResource allocationCacheTransmission (telecommunications)Spectral efficiencyContext (archaeology)Greedy algorithmChannel (broadcasting)Cellular networkDistributed computingWirelessWireless networkAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Device-to-device (D2D) communications combined with Heterogeneous networks (Hetnets) has attracted growing interest. Indeed, Hetnets deploy small-cells within macro-cells in order to offload traffic and improve the overall network coverage and capacity. Whereas, D2D promotes the use of communications between users for content delivery without going through the small or macro bases stations. Hence, it reduces communication delays and improves the spectral efficiency. In this context, we aim in this paper at reducing the average transmission delay, defined as the average sum delays of contents transmission to satisfy users' requests in a macro-cell, by jointly optimizing caching placement and channel resource allocation, in cache-enabled Hetnet with D2D assistance. At first, a lower-bound expression of the average transmission delay is derived. Then, the optimization problem is formulated. Afterwards, we propose a sub-optimal random search algorithm and a low-complexity greedy algorithm that solve the problem. Finally, numerical results illustrate the performances of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207