MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reorientasi Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Literasi Kelautan

2018· article· id· W2908207436 on OpenAlex
Nur Eka Kusuma Hindrasti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and Coastal Ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumGovernment (linguistics)Indonesian governmentLiteracyScientific literacyIndonesianMathematics educationOceanographyScience educationGeographyPedagogyPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesia Maritime Culture, as the first pillar in the concept of maritime axis, is being pursued to be realized by the Government of Indonesia through the maritime curriculum in schools. In fact, Indonesia is experiencing delays in the implementation of marine education (maritime education) compared to countries that have other long shorelines, such as Canada, Japan and the UK. Knowledge of the sea becomes a starting point in marine education (learning and teaching of ocean and aquatic science). This knowledge of the sea is universally agreed upon as ocean literacy, which can be nurtured in marine education. Very little publication of the results of thought and research on Indonesian ocean literacy in national journals, and none in international journals is evidence of Indonesia has not been serious in marine education. In the next maritime curriculum, all subjects required can be integrated with the ocean science. While the subjects closest to ocean science are science learning, especially biology, then geography, physics, and chemistry. Research trends in science learning and teaching in the future should also be oriented to ocean literacy. In addition, socio-scientific issues are also found in marine and coastal life, so student must master of ocean literacy is absolutely done. The study in this article suggests using a system-based approach in teaching science based on ocean literacy. While systemic thinking is the ability to understand and interpret complex systems, and consists of different types and levels of thinking skills. The next suggestion is the application of teaching methods that facilitate systemic thinking skills. Three main suggestions are also given to the marine education community. While the instructional tool that can be adopted to implement marine education is the Ocean Literacy Scope and Squence for Grades K-12. Thus, it is expected that the Indonesian people will be ocean literate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1750.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it