MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908465589 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3526

The space density of<i>z</i> &gt; 4 blazars

2018· article· en· W2908465589 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. Caccianiga, A. Moretti, S. Belladitta, R. Della Ceca, Sonia Antón, L. Ballo, C. Cicone, D. Dallacasa, A. Gargiulo, L. Ighina, M. J. M. Marchã, P. Severgnini

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHorizon 2020Advanced Science InstituteFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversity of California, Los AngelesIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionCenter for Research and Development in Mathematics and ApplicationsUniversity of UtahOffice of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationJet Propulsion LaboratoryAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsBlazarAstrophysicsRedshiftQuasarActive galactic nucleusLuminosity functionSupermassive black holeLuminosityAstronomyGalaxyGamma ray

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-redshift blazars are an important class of active galactic nuclei (AGN) that can provide an independent estimate of the supermassive black hole mass function in high-redshift radio-loud AGN without the bias due to absorption along the line of sight. Using the Cosmic Lens All Sky Survey (CLASS), we built a complete radio flux-limited sample of high-redshift (z > 4) blazars suitable for statistical studies. By combining dedicated optical observations and the SDSS spectroscopic database, we obtained a sample of 26 blazar candidates with a spectroscopic redshift above 4. On the basis of their radio spectrum, we distinguish between blazars and QSO with a Gigahertz Peaked Spectrum (GPS) like spectrum. Out of the 18 confirmed blazars 14 constitute a completely identified, flux-limited sample down to a magnitude of 21 (AB). Using this complete sample, we derive a space density of blazars with 4 < z < 5.5 of = 0.13 +0.05 -0.03 -3 . This is the first actual estimate of the blazar space density in this range of redshift. This value is in good agreement with the extrapolation of the luminosity function and cosmological evolution based on a sample of flat-spectrum radio quasars selected at lower redshifts and it is consistent with a cosmological evolution peaking at z 2 similar to radio-quiet QSO. We do not confirm, instead, the presence of a peak at z 4 in the space density evolution, recently suggested using an X-ray selected sample of blazars. It is possible that this extreme peak of the evolution is present only among the most luminous blazars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207