Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Le Code de Nuremberg :• édicté en 1947 ;• suite aux expérimentations nazies.2. La Déclaration d’Helsinki :• première publication en 1964, la dernière révision date d’octobre 2000 ;• œuvre de l’Association médicale mondiale.3. Les Directives internationales pour la recherche biomédicale impliquant des sujets humains :• première publication en 1982 et une seconde édition remaniée en 1993 ;• œuvre du Conseil des Organisations internationales des sciences médicales (CIOMS).4. Énoncé de politique des trois Conseils :• publié en 1998 ;• document présentant les normes éthiques posées aux chercheurs par trois Conseils de recherche du gouvernement fédéral.5. Plan d’action ministériel en éthique de la recherche et en intégrité scientifique :• publié en 1998 ;• document émanant du ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".