Mapping of Winter Crops and Second-Crop Corn in the Paraná State-Brazil, Using Multitemporal Images From MODIS Sensor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of effective technologies for the monitoring of agricultural crops should seek methodologies that provide information regarding crop development, preferably before harvesting. The study of the monitoring and/or estimation of areas using vegetation indices derived from multitemporal data from MODIS sensors is being studied in the search for greater objectivity of the generated values. In this context, the objective of this study was to map areas with winter and second-crop corn using EVI/MODIS time series from the Terra and Aqua satellites, for the seasons from 2012 to 2014 in the Paraná state of Brazil. Accuracy analysis of the mappings was performed in spatial resolution images of 30 m (LISS-III and Landsat-8), to identify and validate the masks the crops of interest. The accuracy of the mapping obtained values of global precision 87.5%, 79.5%, and 82.0%, with Kappa index of 0.81, 0.69, and 0.73, in the 2012, 2013, and 2014 harvests, respectively. Comparing with data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), the areas obtained by the mappings were underestimated for the second-crop corn in the 2012 and 2013 seasons and overestimated in 2014. The winter crops were overestimated for the three seasons investigated. The use of remote sensing data and techniques can contribute to a quick estimation of crop area information, and can assist in the surveys conducted by official institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".