Bibliographic record
Abstract
The National Geoscience Mapping Program (NATMAP) was established by Canada's federal, provincial, industry, and academic geoscience community in 1990 to promote multidisciplinary, cooperative, computer-based programs of new geological mapping. The program addressed the needs of mineral resource development, environmental and societal concerns, as well as fundamental geological knowledge, along with ensuring the training of student geologists in mapping procedures. Under the auspices of NATMAP, Manitoba Geological Survey (MGS) and Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) cooperated in the completion of surficial geological mapping for the Winnipeg Region. Field data collection for the area southeast of the City of Winnipeg, from 49° to 50° N and from 95° to 97° W, was completed under a first phase of investigations between 1991 and 1996. During a second phase initiated in 1997, mapping was extended north to 51° N and west to 98°W. Field data for the first phase were collected under the direction of G. Matile of MGS in 1993 and 1994. During this phase, 1:100,000 surficial geology maps were completed for the Whitemouth Lake area (52E/SW), the West Hawk Lake area (52E/NW), the Steinbach area (62H/NE) and the Sandilands area (62H/SE). Fieldwork for the second phase was carried out during 1997 and 1998. Data were collected in the Winkler (62H/SW) and Winnipeg (62H/NW) areas by G. Matile in 1997 and 1998. The Woodlands (62I/SW) and Inwood (62I/NW) areas were mapped in 1997 and 1998 by N. Grant of the University of Manitoba. The Beausejour (62I/SE) and Bélair (62I/NE) areas were examined by A. Burt of the University of Waterloo. In the summer of 1998, data collection was completed for the Big Whiteshell Lake (52L/SW) and Nopiming (52L/NW) areas by J. Mann of the University of Manitoba. Maps were subsequently compiled with the aid of air photo interpretation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".