Development of a method for extraction and determination of 4,4′-methylenedianiline in soils by solid-phase extraction and UPLC-MS-MS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 4,4′-methylenedianiline (MDA) substance is an important chemical intermediate which is produced in very large tonnages, the majority of which is consumed in its conversion to 4,4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI). The MDA substance has known adverse effects which can be associated with human and environmental exposure. The growing number and volume of applications of polyurethane formulations containing MDI in the open environment and in agriculture has led to increased concern about indirect exposure to MDA in the environment, where it may occur as a potential degradation product of these polyurethane materials. This method employs ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. A recovery of (101.1 ± 5.2) % of MDA was demonstrated for samples prepared by spiking known amounts of MDA to a representative sandy loam surface soil. The overall method was adjusted to a deliver a dynamic MDA detection range from 5 to 250 μg/kg MDA load (dry wt.) in soils. The accuracy of the method was evaluated at 87%, while intra- and inter-day precision were 9% and 8%, respectively. When coupled with an integrated soil sampling strategy and a solid-liquid extraction protocol validated across a wide variety of soil types, the developed method will prove a powerful tool for definitively quantifying the occurrence (or absence) of MDA in both targeted and exploratory soil monitoring programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it