Discovering Chemicals of Emerging Arctic Concern: Application of New Analytical Approaches to Human Biomonitoring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different analytical strategies are used to discover chemicals of emerging concern in the Arctic. While traditional targeted analyses allow for the identification and quantification of chemicals with a priori knowledge of their presence, semi-targeted and untargeted analyses also permit samples obtained in the framework of human biomonitoring studies to be screened for the presence of unknown or unsuspected pollutants. We recently applied these different analytical strategies to human biomonitoring studies conducted in various regions of the Arctic. Chemical families targeted in plasma samples include polychlorinated biphenyls and chlorinated pesticides, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans as well as perfluorinated compounds. Targeted interrogation of the non polar purified extracts revealed the presence of chlorobenzenes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated naphthalenes, polychlorinated terphenylenes, short-chain chlorinated paraffins and natural halogenated compounds. Through untargeted analyses of extracts, thousands of entities are detected. Chemometric methods such as Kendrick mass defect plot and isotopic pattern detection can be used to attribute unknowns to the proper chemical family and facilitate compound identification. These innovative strategies will help identifying chemicals of emerging Arctic concern that should be included in future biomonitoring studies and considered for inclusion under the Stockholm Convention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it