MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908683941 · doi:10.4095/223795

Crandallite-group minerals: host of thorium enrichment in the eastern Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan

2007· report· en· W2908683941 on OpenAlexaffabout
C J Mwenifumbo, G R Bernius

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThoriumGeochemistryStructural basinGeologyHost (biology)Group (periodic table)MineralogyChemistryUraniumGeomorphologyEcologyBiologyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectral gamma-ray logs in the McArthur River area in eastern Athabasca Basin indicate anomalously high thorium content in the conglomeratic Bird Member and the lower part of the Collins Member of the Manitou Falls Formation. The distribution of Th in such coarse-grained fluvial strata is usually associated with accessory minerals in the heavy-mineral fraction. Instead, petrographic, chemical, and SEM analyses reported here show that Th in the Manitou Falls Formation conglomerate beds resides in a Th-rich aluminophosphate mineral. It belongs to the solid-solution series of the crandallite group, including crandallite (CaAl3(PO4)2(OH)5·H2O) and goyazite (SrAl3(PO4)2(OH)5·H2O). Crandallite-group minerals form in highly acidic environments and are associated with clay minerals such as illite. A more extensive investigation is required to determine the relationships between the Th-rich crandallite-group phase, clay minerals, and the hydrothermal processes that operated during the formation of uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207