MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908856175 · doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000002080

Novel Use of Portable Audiometry to Track Hearing Fluctuations in Menière's Disease: A Pilot Study

2019· article· en· W2908856175 on OpenAlexaff
Darren Tse, Tim Ramsay

Bibliographic record

VenueOtology & Neurotology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAudiologyAudiogramAudiometerAudiometryMeniere's diseaseInterquartile rangeTinnitusVertigoHearing lossPure tone audiometrySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Menière's Disease (MD) is a disorder of the inner ear consisting of episodic attacks of vertigo associated with aural fullness, tinnitus, and fluctuating hearing loss. Hearing levels in MD can often fluctuate over time, and may eventually decline permanently in a step-wise fashion. There are no current studies examining daily hearing fluctuations for prolonged periods in patients with MD. Portable audiometry has the potential to allow the patient to monitor their hearing on a daily basis without attending a center for formal audiology. The objective of this pilot study was to assess feasibility of using iPad-based audiometry on a daily basis to capture hearing fluctuations in a small sample of adult patients with active MD. METHODS: We recruited five patients with active MD as defined by current diagnostic criteria (International Classification of Vestibular Disease 2015). "Active" MD was defined as the patient having had at least one typical Menière's episode within the last 4 weeks. Patients were trained on how to use the portable audiometer and asked to perform at least daily audiograms for 3 months. Patients were asked to manually track vertigo attacks in a diary. Qualitative feedback was obtained from each patient at each monthly visit. For each patient, individual pure tone thresholds at each frequency and pure-tone averages (PTA) were analyzed for maximum and minimum values and interquartile ranges. RESULTS: There were four women and one man, with an average age of 49.8 years. Duration of MD ranged from 4 months to 5 years. None of the patients experienced any technical difficulties performing the testing at home. The average duration of each test was 4.2 minutes, with the longest test taking 19.2 minutes. Patients completed between 45 and 102 tests, with an average of 72. The interquartile range for the PTA ranged from 2.5 to 25 dB for affected ears, and 0 to 6.25 dB for unaffected ears with maximums ranging from 5 to 35 dB in affected ears, and 0 to 10 dB in unaffected ears. CONCLUSIONS: Daily portable audiometry is feasible in patients with MD. Future studies are planned to further analyze hearing fluctuations in MD with respect to frequencies affected, relationship to vertigo attacks, and response to treatments. Understanding hearing fluctuations in MD may aid refinement of diagnostic criteria and improve prognostication for long-term hearing loss, with a goal of informing treatments that might improve final hearing outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOtology & NeurotologySame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207