Résoudre des problèmes scientifiques et technologiques au préscolaire et au primaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entierement conforme au nouveau programme du ministere de l'Education du Quebec et comportant plus de 60 % de contenu nouveau, RESOUDRE des problemes scientifiques et technologiques au prescolaire et au primaire offre plus de 400 problemes, experiences et activites dans une presentation nouvelle et agreable. D'abord concu pour les enseignants qui cherchent des activites simples et faciles a realiser pour enrichir leur facon d'aborder les sciences et la technologie au prescolaire et au primaire, il s'adresse egalement aux parents et a toute personne travaillant en loisir scientifique qui desire augmenter le nombre et la qualite des activites qu'elle peut proposer aux enfants dont elle est responsable. L'introduction traite de l'enseignement des sciences et de la technologie au prescolaire et au primaire. Il y est notamment question de la nature des conceptions des enfants, de l'importance de tenir compte de ces conceptions et des trois grands types d'activites qui peuvent contribuer a les faire evoluer : les activites fonctionnelles, les activites de resolution de problemes qui constituent l'essentiel de l'ouvrage et les activites de structuration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".