MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909005836 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800833

IL-33 Is a Negative Regulator of Vaccine-Induced Antigen-Specific Cellular Immunity

2019· article· en· W2909005836 on OpenAlexaff
Katie O’Grady, Claire C. H. Hearnden, Dulce Bento, Ewa Oleszycka, Peter Andersen, Natalia Muñoz‐Wolf, Ed C. Lavelle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdjuvantImmune systemRegulatorImmunityCD8ImmunologyAcquired immune systemCytokineCellular immunityVaccinationAlumBiologyT cellAntigenChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The cytokine IL-33 is a well-established inducer of Th2 responses. However, roles for IL-33 in promoting CD8, Th1, and T regulatory cell responses have also emerged. In this study, the role of IL-33 as a regulator of particulate vaccine adjuvant-induced Ag-specific cellular immunity was investigated. We found that polymeric nanoparticles surpassed alum in their ability to enhance Ag-specific CD8 and Th1 responses. IL-33 was a potent negative regulator of both CD8+ T cell and Th1 responses following i.m. vaccination with Ag and nanoparticles, whereas the cytokine was required for the nanoparticle enhancement in Ag-specific IL-10. In contrast to the effect on cellular immunity, Ab responses were comparable between vaccinated wild-type and IL-33–deficient mice. IL-33 did not compromise alum-induced adaptive cellular immunity after i.m. vaccination. These data suggest that IL-33 attenuates the induction of cellular immune responses by nanoparticulate adjuvants and should be considered in the rational design of vaccines targeting enhanced CD8 and Th1 responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysFrench-language works237,207