MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909099595 · doi:10.1093/wjaf/18.2.88

Breeding Values of Parental Trees, Genetic Worth of Seed Orchard Seedlots, and Yields of Improved Stocks in British Columbia

2003· article· en· W2909099595 on OpenAlex
Chi Xie, Alvin D. Yanchuk

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Journal of Applied Forestry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeed orchardGenetic gainReforestationTraitPopulationBiologyStatisticsForestryEcologyGeographyMathematicsDemographyGenetic variationHorticultureComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This report describes the procedures that are currently used in British Columbia for predicting the breeding values of parents, estimating the genetic worth of orchard seedlots, and projecting the yields of genetically improved stocks. Breeding value is a measure of the genetic quality of an individual as a parent. There are several procedures available for its estimation/prediction. Among those, the best linear prediction (BLP) relaxes most of the assumptions required by the others and minimizes the error variance of prediction. In most situations in British Columbia, it should provide predictions with satisfactory accuracy and precision with greatly reduced computational complexity. In this province, breeding value for growth potential is expressed as percent gain of stem volume over the unimproved population at a designated rotation age.Genetic worth is an important attribute of the genetic quality of a seedlot. It represents the average level of genetic gain expected for the trait of concern at a designated rotation age when a seedlot is used for reforestation. Currently, the genetic worth of a seedlot is estimated by the mean breeding value of all the parents, including those that contribute to pollen contamination and supplemental mass pollination, weighted by their proportional gamete contributionsThe yield of a genetically improved plantation is projected by incorporating the genetic worth of the seedlot into the existing growth model developed based on extensive data from managed unimproved stands. The current approach not only takes account of the stand dynamics determined by site conditions and silvicultural regimes but also the declining nature of expected gain over time because of imperfect age-age genetic correlation.Because of errors from genetic and environmental sampling, measurement, and analysis, as well as possible violation of model assumptions, estimates/predictions may still be subject to errors and/or biases. Various conservative measures have been taken to minimize any possible upwards biases. As more matured data and advanced analytical technologies become available, both the accuracy and precision will be improved. The advancement made in the procedures described in this document should contribute to superior decisions in many aspects of forest management. West. J. Appl. For. 18(2):88–100.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it