MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909153955 · doi:10.1289/isee.2014.o-121

Childhood Asthma Severity Indicators in Relation to Rural Dwelling

2014· article· en· W2909153955 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joshua Lawson, Donna Rennie, Roland Dyck, Don Cockcroft, Oluwafemi Oluwole, Anna Afanasieva

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPediatric health and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaEnvironmental healthMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood Asthma Severity Indicators in Relation to Rural DwellingAbstract Number:2159 Joshua Lawson*, Donna Rennie, Roland Dyck, Don Cockcroft, Oluwafemi Oluwole, and Anna Afanasieva Joshua Lawson* University of Saskatchewan, Canada, E-mail Address: [email protected] , Donna Rennie University of Saskatchewan, Canada, E-mail Address: [email protected] , Roland Dyck University of Saskatchewan, Canada, E-mail Address: [email protected] , Don Cockcroft University of Saskatchewan , Oluwafemi Oluwole University of Saskatchewan , and Anna Afanasieva University of Saskatchewan AbstractBackground: Asthma prevalence is thought to be lower in rural locations. However, among children with asthma, some rural exposures thought to protect against the development of asthma could also aggravate the condition. We examined childhood asthma severity between urban and rural dwellers with a focus on specific agricultural exposures.Methods: In 2013 we completed a cross-sectional survey of children (5-14 years) from an urban area (approximately 30,000-210,000) and a rural area (<1,500 or farm dwelling) of Saskatchewan, Canada. Surveys of children's respiratory symptoms and agriculture exposures were completed by parents. Current asthma was defined as a previous doctor diagnosis of asthma along with any of wheeze, asthma episodes, breathing medication use, or health care utilization for asthma in the past 12 months.Results: Of the 3,122 children included in the study, 21% lived in a rural area. Asthma prevalence differed between urban (14.8%) and rural (11.2%) locations (p=0.02). After adjustment for confounders, rural dwelling children were more likely to have wheeze severe enough to limit speech to one or two words between breaths (OR=2.50, 95%CI=1.24-5.03, p=0.01). Rural children were less likely to see a physician once for asthma in the past 12 months (OR=0.46, 95%CI=0.22-0.97, p=0.04) with no association in seeing a physician for asthma >1 time in the past 12 months (OR=1.09, 95%CI=0.60-1.97, p=0.77). Children exposed regularly to hay bales, feeding livestock, and cleaning barns were at increased risk of seeing a physician for asthma >1 time in the past 12 months (ORs >3.00). Children who rode horses regularly were at increased risk of wheezing =4 times in the past 12 months.Conclusions: These results suggest that rural children may under-present to a physician initially or for mild disease resulting in asthma under-diagnosis but once the child has asthma, activities on the farm may aggravate the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicPediatric health and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207