MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909200473 · doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2018.12.014

Dual fluoroscopic evaluation of human tibiofemoral joint kinematics during a prolonged standing: A pilot study

2019· article· en· W2909200473 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Science and Technology an International Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuHealth Research BoardUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Florida
KeywordsKinematicsKnee JointTibiaFluoroscopyJoint (building)FemurAnatomyBiomechanicsOrthodonticsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceSurgeryPhysicsRadiologyStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A complete knowledge of tibiofemoral joint kinematics is essential for understanding the function of the healthy and pathological joint. The objective of the present study was to establish a dual fluoroscopic measurement protocol and a data processing approach for the creep response of the knee joint in order to further evaluate the mechanical properties of articular cartilage and meniscus in vivo. A computational approach was developed for the determination of 3D translations and rotations of the joints of young participants with no history of injury using dual fluoroscopic images of loaded joints and joint geometry reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of the unloaded joints. High-resolution X-ray images were obtained for the distal femur and proximal tibia during 10-min standing when approximately 3/4 body weight was slowly applied to the right leg and then kept constant for the rest duration of the test. Anatomic coordinate systems were established for the 3D models of distal femur and proximal tibia. Translations and rotations of the joint as functions of time were then evaluated using the X-ray images and these coordinate systems with the JointTrack software. The displacements in the proximal-distal direction obtained from two participants were consistent, showing a substantial increase in the initial phase when joint loading increased from nil to 3/4 body weight and a continued small increase over time while the joint loading remained constant. The maximum anterior-posterior translations during 10-min standing were approximately 4 mm for both participants, although one showed better stability than the other. In conclusion, a creep loading protocol of the knee joint can be reasonably established for in vivo conditions and evaluated with the image-based computational approach. (C) 2019 Karabuk University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it