Le médicament augmenté : l’usage du médicament dans les discours transhumanistes et ses significations sociales
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Though NBICs and their overlap are at the heart of transhumanist claims in favour of human enhancement, medication also occupies a central place. In many of the movement's writings and lectures, it is one of the primary means systematically considered to extend human biological boundaries and improve physical, intellectual and emotional performance. Taking a sociological perspective, this article aims to explore the role and meaning medication holds in transhumanist discourse. Declared the tool for true human emancipation, the non-therapeutic use of medication for which transhumanists advocate is actually carried out against a heightened biomedicalization of many contemporary social issues. After having explored this ambivalence, our article demonstrates that, hardly specific to this fringe movement, transhumanists' aspirations of pharmacologically reaching ?better than well? fits more broadly into contemporary biomedical pretentions, of which transhumanism is just one extreme example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it