Rationale and Options for Choosing an Optimal Closure Technique for Primary Midsagittal Osteochondrotomy of the Sternum. Part 1: A Theoretical and Critical Review of Functional Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Fracture Healing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sternum is central in binding the bilateral costal structures to form the anterior wall of the thorax. The airtight subatmospheric pressure cavity of the thorax during respiration and episodes of cough produces significant dynamic forces acting perpetually on its walls, influencing functions of the contained viscera. The embryonic development of the sternum concurs with that of the heart and parts of the pectoral girdle. Any imperfection of the sternum, whether congenital or iatrogenic, can significantly compromise the normal physiology of the thoracic wall and cardio-respiratory systems. Midsagittal osteochondrotomy (division) of the sternum is a necessary step to access the mediastinum for an open cardiac procedure. To return the thorax to its normal function, it is imperative that surgeons have thorough working knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the sternum and the biomechanics of an intact and disrupted thoracic wall. Patient-based outcome measures of an index cardiac surgery can only be considered conclusive if the divided sternum heals over time to have full benefit of the surgery. Here, the essential topographical anatomy and embryology of the sternum, thoracic biomechanics, fracture biology, and surgical access to the mediastinum are reviewed to provide a better understanding of the performance and importance of the healed sternum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".