MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909398293 · doi:10.1353/hcy.2019.0010

Picturing Childhood: Youth in Transnational Comics ed. by Mark Heimermann, Brittany Tullis

2019· article· en· W2909398293 on OpenAlex
Bart Beaty

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youth · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComicsGlobeScholarshipReading (process)Media studiesHistoryConfusionSociologySubtitleLiteratureArtPsychologyLawPolitical sciencePsychoanalysisLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Picturing Childhood: Youth in Transnational Comics ed. by Mark Heimermann, Brittany Tullis Bart Beaty Picturing Childhood: Youth in Transnational Comics. Edited by Mark Heimermann and Brittany Tullis. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2017. xiii + 264 pp. Cloth $85, paper $27.95. I have to admit that I struggled a little bit with this collection. As is typical of most essay collections, the work can be hit and miss—but that wasn’t the particular source of my confusion. Rather, the first thing that I asked in my reading notes was “is this a book about comics that feature children or a book about comics [End Page 143] for children?” The subtitle, “Youth in Transnational Comics,” certainly suggested the former, but the essays seemed to stem from both approaches at the same time. More troubling was the specific use of the term “transnational.” While it is absolutely true that there are well developed cartooning traditions about and for children around the globe, I was unclear how the editors might mobilize the term “transnational” in distinction with “international”; how they might conceptualize children’s comics operating across and between national boundaries. While several examples immediately suggested themselves (the development of Disney characters in Italy and Sweden, for example), it was not immediately clear to me how this volume might trouble the centrality of American comics within English-language comics scholarship, and, indeed, I was a tad disappointed to see that it does not. While the editors promise a volume that is “comprehensive (but not exhaustive),” this is impossible to accomplish in a book that is so focused on a single national tradition (10). Of the thirteen essays in the volume, fully eight of them focus on comic books and strips produced in the United States, with only a small amount of space addressing work from Finland, Argentina, Japan, and France. Moreover, only a few of the essays actually address the transnational circulation of comics—the majority focus on discrete local or national examples. Some of the strongest work in this volume outlines material that is little discussed in English-language scholarship on comics. Ralf Kauranen, one of the founders of the Nordic Network for Comics Research (a leading institute in the field), provides an outstanding overview of the use of comics in Finnish propaganda during World War II. This well-written and informative essay provides important historical insights into a cultural phenomenon of which many scholars will be completely ignorant. Annick Pellegrin’s close reading of the work of Fabien Vehlmann within the context of five decades’ worth of publishing for children in Belgium is a lovely model of textual interpretation that will add important social and cultural context for readers coming to the author’s work through recent translations into English. James Nobis’s reading of Osamu Tezuka’s Ayako is an interesting essay that sometimes feels like an outlier in this volume. Relying on the semiotic approach developed by Gunther Kress and Theo van Leeuwen, Nobis reads the text on the level of image analysis while most of the other contributors take a more traditionally literary approach. All this is to say that Picturing Childhood is something of a mixed bag in methodological terms. When the majority of the contributions feature textual analysis rooted in the close reading of exemplary texts, essays like Kauranen’s take the volume in unexpected directions. Given that there are thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of comics worldwide about and for children, the selection of works on hand here defies [End Page 144] easy categorization. There is no strong rationale for some of the choices, which means that essays occasionally sit uneasily next to each other. Many of the essays are about comics that are about children: Tamryn Bennett discusses children in the work of acclaimed post-underground cartoonist Lynda Barry; co-editor Mark Heimermann writes about the work of Canadian cartoonist Jeff Lemire; C. W. Marshall discusses the comics of Paul Hornschemeier; coeditor Brittany Tullis contributes a chapter on Quino’s well-known Argentinean newspaper strip, Mafalda. While each of these chapters offers some interesting insights (and Marshall’s, with its strongly philosophical focus, is intriguingly unlike the others), two essays particularly...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it