MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909519046 · doi:10.1002/slct.201803159

Schiff Bases of Tetrahydrocurcumin as Potential Anticancer Agents

2019· article· en· W2909519046 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Mahal, Ping Wu, Zi‐Hua Jiang, Xiaoyi Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistrySelect · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCurcumin's Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHeLaCurcuminChemistryIn vitroMetabolitePharmacologyCell cultureStereochemistryA549 cellActive metaboliteCombinatorial chemistryBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tetrahydrocurcumin (THC) is a metabolite of curcumin and a valuable lead structure in medicinal chemistry due to its curcumin‐induced biological effects and its derivatives can be promising antitumor agents. Thirteen Schiff base derivatives of THC ( 1 ‐ 13 ) were synthesized by direct condensation of THC with various primary amines in moderate to very good yield (45‐94%) and their structures confirmed by 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, HR‐ESI‐MS and IR techniques. Furthermore, these compounds were screened for in vitro anticancer activity against three human cancer cell lines including human epithelial lung carcinoma (A549), human epithelial cervical cancer (HeLa) and human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF‐7). Most compounds exhibit moderate to good anticancer activity against all three tested cell lines and are significantly more active than THC. Compound 12 bears an N ‐(4‐trifluromethyl)phenylethyl group and is the most active compound with IC 50 values ranging from 4.8 to 12.7 μM. The results obtained herein are important for further structure modifications of THC and the exploitation of the therapeutic potential of THC derivatives as anticancer agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistrySelectSame topicCurcumin's Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207