A Single Nonblinking Cs<sub>4</sub>PbBr<sub>6</sub> Nanoparticle as a Nanothermometer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inorganic perovskite materials have attracted broad interest in the last several years due to their stability and promising applications as photovoltaic and light‐emitting materials. In this work, we prepared Cs4PbBr6 nanoparticles showing stable photoluminescence (PL) without blinking and studied the PL properties of individual Cs4PbBr6 nanoparticles in the biological temperature range. We found that both PL intensity and lifetime of a single Cs4PbBr6 particle strongly depends on the temperature. The PL intensity and lifetime decrease almost linearly with the increasing of the temperature. The slopes of the PL intensity and lifetime versus temperature were as high as 2% and 3% per degree centigrade, respectively. The photostability and thermal stability were also checked for individual particles. With these results, we proposed that the sensitivity of PL intensity and lifetime of a single Cs4PbBr6 nanoparticle on temperature showed the potential application of a single particle as a nanothermometer for thermal detection in a local environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".