MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909529846 · doi:10.1016/j.gee.2018.12.004

Hand-holding and releasing between the anion and cation to change their macroscopic behavior in water

2019· article· en· W2909529846 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kosuke Kuroda, Yumiko Shimada, Kenji Takahashi

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Energy & Environment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicIonic liquids properties and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Science and Technology AgencyAdvanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development ProgramMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceJapan Science and Technology CorporationSwine Innovation Porc
KeywordsZwitterionPhosphoniumSalt (chemistry)Ionic liquidChemistryIonCovalent bondPhosphonium saltAqueous solutionIonic bondingPhase (matter)Base (topology)Inorganic chemistryChemical physicsPolymer chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the similarity of ionic liquid and zwitterion, their some properties such as conductivity and hydrophobicity are different. Here we developed a novel phosphonium salt having a dynamic covalent bond between anion and cation, enabling reversible structural shift between free ion pair and zwitterion. With the phosphonium salt, control of the macroscopic phase behavior in aqueous solution, i.e. forming mono- or bi-phasic systems, upon exposure to an acid or base was reversibly achieved, based on the structural shift of the phosphonium salt. CO 2 /N 2 bubbling reversibly changed the phase behavior as well as acid/base, leading to green separation systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen Energy & EnvironmentSame topicIonic liquids properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207