MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909726724 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2019.2894096

A Novel High-Pass Delta–Sigma Modulator-Based Digital-IF Transmitter With Enhanced Performance for SDR Applications

2019· article· en· W2909726724 on OpenAlexaff
Anis Ben Arfi, Maryam Jouzdani, Mohamed Helaoui, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterDelta-sigma modulationElectronic engineeringOversamplingAmplifierTopology (electrical circuits)Quantization (signal processing)Transmitter power outputElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)CMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This brief presents a new transmitter architecture based on digital-intermediate frequency (IF) high-pass delta-sigma modulator (HPDSM). The proposed digital-IF transmitter topology utilizes a novel complex HPDSM topology to address the high quantization-noise power problem in Cartesian band-pass BPDSM and HPDSM-based digital-IF transmitters, without increasing the oversampling ratio of the signal or the clock rate of the system. To evaluate the performance of the new digital-IF transmitter system, a comparison with its Cartesian band-pass and high-pass counterparts, in terms of signal to noise and distortion radio (SNDR) and coding efficiency, was established. A simulation using 8 dB peak to average power ratio long term evolution signals with 1.24-MHz bandwidth showed that by integrating the proposed second-order complex HPDSM digital-IF in the transmitter, the power of the quantization noise is significantly reduced. The transmitter digital blocks were implemented on the BEEcube software-defined radio prototyping platform. The input signal is encoded by the new HPDSM topology and is up-converted and then fed to the inverse class-F switch-mode power amplifier. An overall efficiency of 12% was achieved by the proposed topology. Moreover, the output signal SNDR reached 37.8 dB and the adjacent channel leakage ratio at the lower and upper 1.25-MHz offset frequencies measured is equal to -35 dBc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207