MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909734447 · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000689

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in a Chronic Pelvic Pain Population

2019· article· en· W2909734447 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne G. Sammarco, Emily K. Kobernik, Hope K. Haefner, Sara R. Till, Mitchell B. Berger

Bibliographic record

VenueFemale Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeLower urinary tract symptomsInternal medicinePelvic painDepression (economics)Urinary systemPopulationOdds ratioCohortMcGill Pain QuestionnaireInterstitial cystitisPhysical therapyVisual analogue scaleSurgeryCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in a chronic pain population. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, patients referred to a female pelvic pain clinic completed several validated questionnaires assessing bladder symptoms, central sensitization, pain symptoms, depression, anxiety, and neuropathic pain. Patients diagnosed as having interstitial cystitis were excluded. Patient demographic characteristics and survey responses were compared across American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) severity categories. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of moderate-to-severe AUA-SI scores. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients were included in the analysis. American Urological Association Symptom Index data showed that 48.8% of patients had mild, 31.2% had moderate, and 20.0% had severe symptoms. Patients reporting moderate or severe AUA-SI scores had higher mean Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) scores (46.7 ± 16.0 vs 32.9 ± 13.8, P < 0.0001), McGill scores (median, 25 [interquartile range, 16-38] vs 13 [5-27]; P = 0.0003), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depression T-scores (median, 53.9 [interquartile range, 46.2-61.6] vs 51.2 [37.1-55.3]; P = 0.009), Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency Symptoms Scale scores (18.4 ± 6.2 vs 12.5 ± 5.4, P < 0.0001), and Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs scores (median, 10.5 [interquartile range, 3.0-16.5] vs 6.0 [1.0-12.0]; P = 0.02). The odds of moderate-to-severe AUA-SI symptoms were higher with a positive PUF and CSI score and were lower with a diagnosis of vestibular pain. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms among patients with chronic pelvic pain. Vestibulodynia was associated with lower odds of bladder symptoms. High PUF and CSI scores were significantly associated with moderate-to-severe bladder symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFemale Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207