Progressive increases in fat mass occur in adults living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy, but patterns differ by sex and anatomic depot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although weight gain on ART is common, the long-term trajectory of and factors affecting increases in fat mass in people living with HIV are not well described. METHODS: Men and women living with HIV in the Modena HIV Metabolic Clinic underwent DXA scans every 6-12 months for up to 10 years (median 4.6 years). Regression modelling in both combined and sex-stratified models determined changes in and clinical factors significantly associated with trunk and leg fat mass over the study period. RESULTS: A total of 839 women and 1759 men contributed two or more DXA scans. The baseline median age was 44 years and BMI 22.9 kg/m2; 76% were virologically suppressed on ART at baseline. For both sexes, trunk and leg fat consistently increased over the study period, with mean yearly trunk and leg fat gain of 3.6% and 7.5% in women and 6.3% and 10.8% in men, respectively. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with greater fat mass included female sex, per-year ART use (specifically tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and integrase strand transfer inhibitor therapy), per-unit BMI increase, no self-reported physical activity and CD4 nadir <200 cells/mm3. CONCLUSIONS: Among people living with HIV on ART, trunk and leg fat mass increased steadily over a median of 4.6 years of follow up, particularly among women. After controlling for traditional risk factors, HIV- and ART-specific risk factors emerged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".