Investigation of Chlorophacinone-related Goose Deaths in Monterey County, California
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2008, approximately 70 Canada geese were recovered dead in the Moro Cojo Slough area of Monterey County, California. Birds were necropsied and showed signs of abnormal internal bleeding. A total of 37 livers were analyzed for anticoagulants and 36 of these livers contained chlorophacinone. Death was attributable to chlorophacinone poisoning. Two turkey vultures and a barn owl also died, probably as a result of secondary chlorophacinone poisoning. The source of the chlorophacinone was not obvious, as chlorophacinone is used in several different forms on many different crops and also in commensal use. In addition, there often are several days between exposure and death, allowing the movement of the animal from the site of exposure. The ensuing investigations, which lasted several months, suggested that the exposure was due to expanded use of chlorophacinone pellets on artichokes used to control California voles. Subsequently, the label of the rodenticide product was modified to restrict its use when conditions favor goose presence in artichoke fields. No deaths have occurred since the label modification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".